BS: Global liquidity drought threatens another bloodbath in markets, warns top banker
Investors face a âpainfulâ adjustment in a world of evaporating liquidity and higher U.S. interest rates that will prompt huge market swings with potentially catastrophic financial consequences, the Institute of International Finance has warned.
Tim Adams, the chief executive of the IIF, which represents the worldâs biggest banks, described liquidity as the âtop issueâ at meetings of central bankers, chief executives and other financial institutions. He warned that regulations introduced in the wake of the 2008 crisis could potentially cause market gyrations larger than last Octoberâs sudden crash in U.S. treasuries.
While Adams supports tougher rules that have made banks more resilient, he said a complex web of regulatory reform may have left them less able to respond to the next crisis.
Related
Bill Gross says the bull market âsupercycleâ is finally coming to an end
Fed up with the rising fees at Canadaâs big banks? Thereâs an easy solution
Should we be worried? This $300-billion man is dumping stocks and buying bonds
âThereâs just less capacity for making markets,â he said. âOfficials will say: we expect some volatility and this was part of this broader scheme of regulatory reform. But for the private sector there is this issue of: is the total effect of all of these various regulatory changes likely to produce outcomes larger than each individual regulatory reform and its consequences? The cumulative unintended could end up being much larger than the one-off intended â we just donât know.â
Market liquidity, or the ease with which an investor can quickly buy or sell a security without moving its price, has evolved since the financial crisis. Investment banks, which traditionally supported liquidity in times of stress, have been shrinking their activities.
Corporate bond inventories have fallen by 75 per cent in the U.S. and 50 per cent in Europe since 2007, according to IIF data. While much of this has been driven by investment banks unwinding large credit books, regulation has also discouraged banks from holding large quantities of bonds that could help cushion violent swings in prices.
Adams said a âdramatic revolutionâ of the players and risks of market-making had also pushed risk âout into the shadowsâ of non-bank lending.
âWeâve rewired and reengineered the global financial regulatory system and as a result weâre having profound impacts on institutional arrangements. At the same time weâve had this rapid change in benchmark prices such as a 50 per cent drop in the price of oil, a rapid change in the dollar and other exchange rates and another drop in commodity prices,â he said.
âOnce you bring the rapid change in major benchmark prices and a change in the architecture of the global financial system together, you could end up with outcomes that are pretty painful, and certainly unknowable.â
He warned that the U.S. Federal Reserveâs first interest rate rise in almost a decade would also cause disruption, and that âthe most transparent and telegraphed move in monetary historyâ was unlikely to prevent some dollar denominated debts from âblowing upâ in emerging markets.
He said developing economies which had built up large debts were most at risk of capital flight. âThe question is: is some of that debt going to blow up, and then is there a sovereign balance sheet behind it? Those countries are going to feel strained.â